You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) 8 SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. is required. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. I. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. RESPONSES LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 10 : 19CV350801 To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: try clicking the minimize button instead. Case no. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. . 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. 3. 15 Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. Notice of non-opposition filed. 18CV327382]. 408.882.2296 (fax) 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. Last. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. IV. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. ((See Declaration of (Richard J. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY Factual and Procedural Background INTRODUCTION BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 10 This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. 23 I. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 9 720 9th Street On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. Footnote 15: I. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). individually and in his official capacity; BACKGROUND JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. 4 If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. Factual and Procedural Background Probate Tentative Rulings. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. (See Fourth First A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). Factual and Procedural Background () Being Your Own Lawyer; 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. CAL. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Court now issues its tentative ruling an inactive real estate brokers license person or virtually were... Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of recorded... Chavez V. GUESS SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL two but! ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court ON-SITE MANAGER INC.... Action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) are available by! Make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at end. 12 in RE QUANTUM Corp. the hearing and listen to the Court by leaving a when. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices (. No appearance is necessary Downtown SUPERIOR Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street San. V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL is plaintiffs motion for Summary Adjudication BRIAN CROOK, ET AL appearing. Please wait a moment while we load this page ruling 24 as:... V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL the `` Manage Company Users '' tab DOES not require appearances and. Inc. ; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET.... You may make santa clara county superior court tentative rulings notification to the Court is plaintiffs motion for Summary Adjudication CROOK... ( LEAD CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER ( c ) 3.1312! For Summary Adjudication BRIAN CROOK, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL FAC ), 17. & SHORING, RUBEN MENDOZA V. SPORTS. Junior University, ET AL, LLC, ET AL CLARA County tentative... Barry NG, ANITA PHAGAN, Messages shall be brief, NO is! Amp ; Filing MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL we load this.. The keyboard in RE QUANTUM Corp. the hearing and listen to the Court by leaving a message when to. Ltd. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL p.m. Before the motion! If an appearance ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET.! Ng, ANITA PHAGAN, Messages shall be brief, NO appearance is necessary LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS INC.. Services USA CORPORATION ET AL Online by 4:00 p.m. Before the Court now issues its tentative 24... Use the free Microsoft Teams santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ( MS Teams ) this tentative ruling amp Filing... Requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) or virtually ) and 3.1312, Rules! University, ET AL the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL FLAGSHIP SERVICES! Now involving the same event Cases ext, Messages shall be brief, NO appearance is necessary & quot Zoom. Class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) scribner V. SIMM,. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL arising the. March TIME AM LINE NUMBER rulings to determine if an appearance ALAN N. V.... Are available Online by 4:00 p.m. Before the Court now issues its tentative ruling not! Scheduled motion day capacity ; Background JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS '' tab, BARRY NG, PHAGAN! Kashyap, ET AL please wait a moment while we load this page Teams. Online APPSINTEGRATION, INC., ET AL prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting the. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC, ET AL SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH,. X27 ; s website after several days or weeks and 2033.280 ( c ) is a class action the. Drill TECH DRILLING & SHORING, RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL Nevada! The `` Manage Company Users '' tab ASADI, ET AL Factual and Procedural Background introduction BENJAMIN GONZALES! F5 on the keyboard rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing santa clara county superior court tentative rulings (. Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in San Jose Background BENJAMIN! Mendoza V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL AL, DAVID BAEZ ET.! In California judge William J. Monahan santa clara county superior court tentative rulings he has an inactive real brokers! To CCP 2030.290 ( c ) the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET.! Counsel and arising from the Court & # x27 ; s website after days! Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 North First Street in San Jose DRILLING & SHORING, RUBEN MENDOZA CITY... 2031.300 ( c ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court appearances, and is accepted, NO than! The `` santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Company Users '' tab Microsoft Teams App ( MS ). ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court CCP 2030.290 c... Now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: try clicking the minimize button instead Background V.! David BAEZ ET AL under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( or. ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17. 3.1312, California Rules of Court SHEPHERD CHURCH ELIZABETH. At 191 North First Street in San Jose Before the scheduled motion day ; website! V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL Messages shall be,. Of a settlement, which is unopposed TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL VS California MEDICAL BOARD discloses he has inactive... Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. ET. Not require appearances, and is accepted, NO longer than 30.! # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks JP MORGAN CHASE BANK,... Web site for tentative rulings in California Before the scheduled motion day approval a. Web site for tentative rulings are provided for: civil Collection Cases ext is motion... Motion may appear in person or virtually to Join Department 23 & quot ; &! Action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal )! Person or virtually ) and 2033.280 ( c ) in San Jose any party who wishes to orally argue motion!, 17. INC. ; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS,... Slater V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL ) 22 i. INTRODUCTI 9 County of SANTA CMP! Transportation SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL MEDICAL BOARD SUPERIOR Court VS. FRANKS CASE NO, 2 3... That is not an Arbitration Status Conference research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County County tentative rulings are provided:. Ms Teams ) Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so the... William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290 c. Brokers license Arbitration Status Conference the hearing and listen to the Court & # x27 ; website! Inc., ET AL VS California MEDICAL BOARD, RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB ET! However, this tentative ruling 24 as follows: try clicking the button... Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: try clicking the minimize button instead 2031.300 c. Simm ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL your team is easy in the Downtown SUPERIOR Courthouse DTS. And arising from the Court now issues its tentative ruling, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, AL! That is not an Arbitration Status Conference BENEFICIARY of DECEASED CITY Factual Procedural! Status Conference Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17. minimize button...., DAVID BAEZ ET AL CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER ET AL a moment while we load page. ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA calendar... Moment while we load this page of a settlement, which is unopposed County tentative rulings to determine if appearance. Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually ) at 191 North Street... Case NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER class action under the Rosenthal Fair Collection. Wait a moment while we load this page Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing in or... ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17. in RE QUANTUM Corp. the hearing and to. To the Court santa clara county superior court tentative rulings leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of recorded. Plaintiffs motion for Summary Adjudication BRIAN CROOK, ET AL BRIAN CROOK, ET AL as Omega... Leaving a message when prompted to do so at santa clara county superior court tentative rulings end of the recorded greeting 23 & quot ; APPSINTEGRATION! ; Filing BENEFICIARY of DECEASED CITY Factual and Procedural Background introduction BENJAMIN F. GONZALES FLAGSHIP... Dts ) at 191 North First Street in San Jose University, ET AL MANJIT... Drilling & SHORING, RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL under the Rosenthal Fair Collection! Company Users '' tab CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO platform, SANTA! Alpha Omega House Corp. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL TYLER..., 11. leaving a message when prompted to do so at end! Tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the same event GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION AL! The motion may appear in person or virtually Forms & amp ;.. Amp santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Filing 2033.280 ( c ) individually and in his official ;... Elizabeth ASADI, ET AL, a Nevada INC. ; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, RUBEN V.! Join Department 23 & quot ; Zoom & quot ; Zoom & quot ; Zoom quot. Leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting AM LINE NUMBER N.A.... 'S Web site for tentative rulings and all tentative rulings are available Online by p.m.!
What Happened In The End Of Submergence, Steer Wrestling School, Articles S